SUMMARY
The best AI interview tools in India in 2026 are Keka (AI screener, interview scoring, and notetaker inside your ATS), HireVue, Talview, iMocha, InCruiter, Intervue, BarRaiser, HirePro, Mercer | Mettl, HackerEarth, and Interviewer.AI. We compared them on AI interviewing, async video, interview notes and scoring, fraud checks, Indian-language support, and INR pricing.
Best AI Interview Tools in India at a Glance
Picture a big hiring or campus drive. Thousands of applicants come in, but you only have a few interviewers. First rounds take up hours of their time, and interview notes end up all over the place.
That’s where AI interview tools help. Some run the first interview for you. Some score videos that candidates record on their own. Others sit in on your interviews to take notes, write summaries, and score answers.
This list is for Indian hiring teams of any size, and it zooms in on one thing: the interview step, because that’s what eats up most of your interview panel’s week. If you’re looking for AI that helps with everything else too, from sourcing candidates to scheduling, check out our guide to AI recruiting software.
| Tool | Best For (tool type) | Pricing | Free trial | G2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keka | AI screening, scoring and notes inside the ATS (AI interviewer + interview intelligence) | Custom | Yes | 4.4 |
| HireVue | Enterprise async video and AI assessments (async video) | Custom | No (demo only) | 4.1 |
| Talview | AI interviewer with fraud and proxy checks (AI interviewer) | Custom | No (demo only) | 4.4 |
| iMocha | AI interviewer tied to skills tests (AI interviewer) | Custom | No (demo only) | 4.4 |
| InCruiter | AI interviewer plus outsourced human interviews (AI interviewer) | Custom | Yes | 4.6 |
| Intervue | AI screening agent plus expert-led tech interviews (AI interviewer) | Custom | Yes (on request) | 4.4 |
| BarRaiser | Interview notes and co-pilot for human panels (interview intelligence) | Custom | No (demo only) | 4.7 |
| HirePro | Proctored video interviews for campus and mass hiring (async video) | Quote-based | No (quote only) | 4.5 |
| Mercer | Mettl | Video interviews bundled with assessments and proctoring (async video) | Custom | No (demo only) | 4.4 |
| HackerEarth | Live coding interviews and an AI interview agent (interview intelligence) | Starts at $99 per month | No (demo only) | 4.5 |
| Interviewer.AI | Self-serve async AI video screening (async video) | Starts at $199 per month | Yes (14 days) | 4.6 |
First rounds eating your panel’s week?
See how Keka’s AI screener, interview scoring and AI notetaker move candidates from application to decision. Book a Keka demo.
How We Came Up With This List of Best AI Interview Tools in India in 2026
To test each tool, we went through product demos and walkthroughs for each one. We also read recent user reviews on G2 and Capterra, watched product videos on YouTube, and checked Reddit threads on r/recruitinghell, r/humanresources, and r/recruiting where hiring teams compare notes.
-
AI interview quality: Does it ask real follow-up questions, run over voice, chat, or video, and tie scores to competencies with a transcript, not a black-box number?
-
Interview intelligence for human rounds: Notes, transcripts, summaries, and scorecards a panel will actually read.
-
Fraud and integrity checks: Identity verification, proxy detection, proctoring, and AI-answer flags, each backed by a real user review.
-
India fit: Hindi and regional languages, low-bandwidth mobile, Naukri and LinkedIn integrations, and campus scale (we mark anything a vendor does not publish).
-
ATS and workflow fit: Do scores flow back to the candidate record, or sit in a separate tool the panel ignores?
-
Pricing and data protection: Per-interview versus per-seat in INR, recording retention, consent, and DPDP readiness. Where a score belongs, it belongs on a proper interview scorecard, so we checked whether each tool produces one.
DISCLAIMER
Keka is our product, and we’ve evaluated it using the same criteria and standards as every other platform on this list.
Top 11 AI Interview Tools in India in 2026: The Ultimate Breakdown
1. Keka (4.4/5 G2)
Keka is an all-in-one HR platform and PSA software for global companies of all sizes. The tool type here in spotlight is AI interviewer plus interview intelligence.
Keka can interview candidates for you and take notes during your own interviews. It’s all part of the Screening & Interviews module inside Keka Hire, so there’s no separate tool to log into.
Basically, an AI screener talks to every applicant first. Then AI scores each candidate at the screening stage. In later rounds, an AI notetaker joins your interviews. All the scores, notes, and flags move with the candidate into onboarding and goal-setting, inside Keka’s hiring software.

Key features
-
AI screener that holds a first conversation with every applicant, checks fit, and fills gaps in the application
-
AI-assisted scoring that feeds a ranked, reasoned shortlist
-
AI notetaker that records, transcribes, and summarizes later rounds
-
Role-specific interview kits and scorecards, with every panel score, note, and flag in one view
-
Candidate self-scheduling with multi-panel calendar coordination, on the same record as onboarding, payroll, and performance
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
• AI interview, scorecards and the ATS in one system, HR praise it for its overall efficiency. |
• Companies operating across multiple countries may need to configure workflows around their different workforce and compliance requirements. |
Pricing: Custom. A free trial is available.
Best for: Talent acquisition heads, recruiters, and hiring managers at Indian companies of every size who want AI interviewing and interview notes inside the same system as hiring and HR.
Not for: Teams that only need a standalone one-way video tool and nothing else from a hiring platform.
Here’s how Keka rates with its own users on G2:

2. HireVue (4.1/5 G2)
HireVue is the best-known enterprise video interviewing and assessment platform, used by large global employers and GCCs that hire in India. It combines one-way and live video interviews with AI-scored assessments and a tool for building structured interviews.

Key features
-
On-demand (one-way) and live video interviews
-
AI-scored, job-related assessments
-
Structured interview builder for consistent panels
-
Conversational AI for scheduling and candidate FAQs
-
Integrations with major enterprise ATS and HCM systems
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
• Proven at very high volume, with many users highlighting the clear voice functionality. |
• Enterprise pricing and setup, and candidates often say they dislike one-way video. |
Best for: Large enterprises and MNC capability centers in India running high-volume graduate and lateral hiring.
Not for: Small teams that want a simple, self-serve tool.
Pricing: Custom, demo only. HireVue does not publish list pricing; you need to request a quote on its site.
*Here’s how HireVue rates with its own users on G2:*

3. Talview (4.4/5 G2)
Talview is a good pick if you’re worried about candidates cheating. It has two AI tools. Ivy runs the interview and asks follow-up questions based on what each candidate says. Alvy watches for cheating by checking the candidate’s face, voice, and device, so it can catch someone taking the interview for another person. If Alvy flags something, a real person reviews it.

Key features
-
Ivy conversational AI interviewer with adaptive follow-ups
-
Transcripts, competency scores and behavioral insights
-
Alvy AI proctor with face, voice, and device checks
-
Campus and graduate hiring workflows
-
Human escalation on flagged sessions
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
• Strong integrity features, which barely gives any performance issues. |
• Some have reported frustrated test experience with unclear setup requirement. |
Best for: Enterprises and BFSI or IT firms where interview fraud is a real risk.
Not for: Small teams with only a handful of hires a month.
Pricing: Custom, quote-based. Talview does not publish India list pricing, so you’ll need to request a demo. Also, do not rely on third-party USD listings.
Here’s how Talview rates with its own users on G2:

4. iMocha (4.4/5 G2)
iMocha is a skills assessment company whose AI interviewer, Tara, is built on its skills-intelligence engine. It’s a single candidate flow that combines the interview and a skills test and scores them together, so you can judge candidates on what they can actually do, not just how they interview.

Key features
-
Tara AI interviewer with adaptive follow-ups
-
Live transcript and a structured interview report
-
Large skills-test library across tech and functional roles
-
AI communication assessment for English proficiency
-
ATS integrations to push results to the candidate record
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
• Interview and skills test in one candidate flow, combining technical and soft skills. |
• Some users have requested deep reporting and analytics features. |
Best for: Tech and functional hiring where a skills test must back the interview.
Not for: Teams that only need note-taking for live human rounds.
Pricing: Custom. Check imocha.io/pricing for current India or per-assessment pricing.
Here’s how iMocha rates with its own users on G2:

5. InCruiter (4.6/5 G2)
InCruiter is an Indian company with two products that work together: IncBot, an AI video interviewer for high-volume screening across soft, technical, and coding skills, and IncServe, interviews run by a network of freelance expert interviewers. Together they can take both AI and human first rounds off your panel.

Key features
-
IncBot AI video interviewer for high-volume screening
-
IncServe outsourced expert interviewers on demand
-
Multiple languages and accents for candidate comfort
-
Instant structured feedback reports
-
Video interview platform with scheduling
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
• Streamlines interview scheduling, coordination, and execution, which saves time and cuts down on manual work. |
• People have reported it to be more confusing than streamlined in a few cases. |
Best for: Companies that want to outsource first rounds, whether AI or human.
Not for: Teams that want to keep every round in-house on their own platform.
Pricing: Custom, per-interview. Check incruiter.com for current plans and confirm recording retention.
Here’s how InCruiter rates with its own users on G2:

6. Intervue (4.4/5 G2)
Intervue is a company that started as interview-as-a-service for tech roles. Now it also offers an AI Screening Agent that calls candidates, asks relevant questions, and shortlists the best ones. You just upload your job description, and the AI builds the interview from it, checking each candidate’s eligibility, experience, and skills in a single call. Intervue still offers live technical interviews run by experts, too.

Key features
-
AI Screening Agent set up from a JD, skills, and seniority
-
Expert-led live technical interviews
-
Coding and system-design interview environment
-
Structured scorecards for engineering roles
-
Custom pricing on annual contracts
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
• Saves engineering panel hours by screening and a structured interview. |
• Interviewers on its expert panel have reported delays with weekly payouts. |
Best for: Tech companies and GCCs hiring engineers at volume.
Not for: Non-tech and frontline hiring.
Pricing: Custom pricing on annual contracts. Check intervue.io for current INR pricing.
*Here’s how Intervue rates with its own users on G2:
* 
7. BarRaiser (4.7/5 G2)
BarRaiser is a platform built to make human panels better, not to replace them. Its interview co-pilot suggests questions and writes notes in real time, pushes automatic feedback to the ATS, and reports on interviewer quality, backed by an expert interviewer network when you need extra hands.
Key features
-
Interview co-pilot with suggested questions and real-time guidance
-
Automatic notes and structured feedback pushed to the ATS
-
Interview-intelligence analytics on interviewer quality
-
Video interview platform for live rounds
-
Expert interviewer network on demand
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
• Makes interviewers more consistent, especially with technical evaluation of candidates. |
• Platform can be a bit expensive for junior level hiring. |
Best for: Companies that want better, more consistent human interviews, not AI replacing them.
Not for: Teams that want AI to run fully automated first rounds.
Pricing: Custom, quote-based. Request pricing from barraiser.com.
Here’s how BarRaiser rates with its own users on G2:
*
*
8. HirePro (4.5/5 G2)
HirePro offers AI-based virtual hiring for enterprises. It’s built for huge campus drives. It can run video interviews for thousands of candidates, watch for cheating with AI and live proctors, and test coding and job skills, all in one campus hiring process.

Key features
-
Video interviews at campus-drive scale
-
AI live and automated proctoring
-
Coding and functional assessments
-
Campus-hiring workflow management
-
Interview services for overflow volume
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
• Built for very large campus drives, intuitive for both new hires and administrators. |
• Quote-only pricing and enterprise setup, integration can be a challenge. |
Best for: IT services, BPO, and large employers running campus and mass drives.
Not for: Small teams with steady, low hiring volume.
Pricing: Quote-based, enterprise. HirePro prices on request.
*Here’s how HirePro rates with its own users on G2:
* 
9. Mercer | Mettl (4.4/5 G2)
Mercer | Mettl is best known for its tests, and it offers video interviews too. You get a large library of personality, aptitude, and coding tests, plus live and recorded video interviews where your team can share feedback. AI watches for cheating during remote tests and interviews. The main appeal is that you get your tests and interviews from one company.
Key features
-
Live and recorded video interviews
-
Large psychometric, cognitive, and coding test library
-
AI remote proctoring
-
Feedback and panel collaboration tools
-
Integrations with enterprise hiring stacks
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
• One vendor for tests and interviews, on a large assessment library with proctoring. |
• Rating can be a bit more contributing factor at times when test results are inconclusive. |
Best for: Teams that want one vendor for assessments and interviews.
Not for: Teams that want the deepest dedicated AI interviewer.
Pricing: Custom, quote-based.
Here’s how Mercer | Mettl rates with its own users on G2:
*
* 
10. HackerEarth (4.5/5 G2)
HackerEarth is a platform for hiring developers. It has two interview tools. FaceCode runs live coding interviews and writes up a summary afterward. It can also hide candidates’ personal details, like their name, so reviewers judge the code fairly. OnScreen is its AI interviewer. It uses lifelike video avatars to run the interview, checks candidates’ identity, and watches for cheating. HackerEarth works best when your interview is a coding round.

Key features
-
FaceCode live coding interviews with automated summaries
-
PII masking for fairer, less biased reviews
-
OnScreen AI interview agent with identity checks
-
Large coding question library
-
Behavioral insights on coding sessions
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
• Strong for live coding interviews, with automated summaries and exact scores based on test cases. |
• Developer-focused, UI can feel cluttered and overwhelming sometimes. |
Best for: Engineering teams running live technical interviews at volume.
Not for: Non-engineering and frontline hiring.
Pricing: From $99/month (Growth, billed monthly); OnScreen AI interviewer from $129/month; Enterprise is custom. Check hackerearth.com for current pricing and confirm OnScreen availability.
Here’s how HackerEarth rates with its own users on G2:

11. Interviewer.AI (4.6/5 G2)
Interviewer.AI is a tool for one-way AI video interviews. Candidates record their answers on their own time, and AI scores both what they say and how well they communicate. It can also write interview questions from your job description, and candidates can easily take the interview on their phones. It’s a good self-serve option for smaller teams.

Key features
-
One-way AI video interviews
-
AI scoring of answers and communication
-
AI question generation from a JD
-
Mobile-first candidate experience
-
ATS integrations to route results
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
• AI-powered evaluation and a quick candidate experience for self-serve one-way video screening. |
• Users have reported that they’d also prefer analytics to which pages receives more views on sites. |
Best for: smaller teams that want a self-serve async video screener.
Not for: Teams that need Indian-language depth or INR billing without confirming it first.
Pricing:
-
Essential: $199/month billed monthly
-
Professional: $399/month billed monthly
Here’s how Interviewer.AI rates with its own users on G2:
\
How to Choose the Right AI Interview Tool in India
Start from where your interview hours actually go, first rounds, panels, or campus drives, and pick the tool type that removes them. Then work through these five checks in order.
1. Decide which type of tool you need
There are three types:
-
An AI interviewer runs the first round and talks to candidates for you.
-
One-way video lets candidates record their answers on their own time, and you review them later.
-
Interview intelligence sits in on your human interviews and handles notes, transcripts, and scoring.
For example, if a sales hiring drive brings in 2,000 applicants and you only have two recruiters, an AI interviewer can handle the first round. But if your problem is six interviewers writing six different kinds of notes, interview intelligence is the better fix.
Check How the AI Scores Candidates
Ask for the scoring rubric, the transcript, and how a recruiter can override a score. Avoid black-box scores you cannot explain to a rejected candidate or an auditor. Tie this to fairness: structured questions and a published rubric are what keep bias in AI recruitment in check. Example: a recruiter on r/recruiting who cannot see why a candidate scored 62 will stop trusting the tool within a week.
Test the Fraud Checks
Candidates now use live AI copilots and proxies, so the integrity layer matters as much as the interview. Check identity verification, proctoring, and answer-authenticity flags, and ask what happens when a session is flagged. Example: threads on r/recruiting regularly describe a confident candidate on video who turns out to be reading from a second screen, which is exactly what face, voice, and device checks are meant to catch.
Make Sure It Works for Indian Candidates
India fit is not a footnote. Check Hindi and your hiring region’s languages and accents, low-bandwidth mobile for tier-2 and tier-3 candidates, and campus scale. Ask for a demo in the actual language your candidates will use, not just English, and watch how the tool behaves on a patchy mobile connection.
Keep Scores Inside Your ATS
If scores sit in a separate tool, panels ignore them. Prefer native modules or a genuine two-way ATS sync so the AI score lands on the candidate record next to everything else. If you are choosing the ATS at the same time, the AI recruiting software and best recruitment software guides cover that decision.
| Primary need | Pick |
|---|---|
| AI first rounds, notes and scorecards inside the ATS | Keka |
| Async video at very high volume | HireVue |
| Interview integrity and proxy detection | Talview |
| Interview plus skills test | iMocha or Mercer | Mettl |
| Outsource first rounds (AI or human) | InCruiter or Intervue |
| Better human panels | BarRaiser |
| Campus and mass drives | HirePro |
| Developer interviews | HackerEarth |
Candidate Data, Recordings and the DPDP Act in India
This matters because an AI interview captures a candidate’s voice, face, answers and scores, all of which are personal data under India’s Digital Personal Data Protection framework. The DPDP Rules were notified on 13 November 2025, and the core obligations, notice and consent, data-principal rights, security safeguards and cross-border transfer rules, phase in through to May 2027, so the time to get vendor practices right is now.
Before you sign, check that the tool:
-
Asks for clear consent before recording, in a language the candidate understands
-
Uses recordings only for that hiring decision
-
Has clear rules on how long recordings are kept and how they’re deleted
-
Stores data securely, with certifications like ISO 27001 or SOC 2
-
Lets a person review AI scores before anyone is rejected
DISCLAIMER
This guidance is meant to help you evaluate, not to give you any legal advice.
**
Which AI Interview Tool Is Best for You
The best AI interview tool depends on where your interview hours go: an AI interviewer for first rounds, async video for volume, or interview intelligence for human panels. For Indian companies of all sizes that want AI screening, scoring, and notes inside the same system as hiring and HR, Keka is the pick, because the AI interview feeds the shortlist, the panel, and onboarding without a second tool to reconcile.
| If your priority is… | Pick |
|---|---|
| AI screening, scoring and notes in the same system as hiring, onboarding and HR | Keka |
| AI interviews where fraud and proxies are a real risk | Talview |
| Better and consistent human panels | BarRaiser |
Choose the one that fits your requirements and budget. The idea is to streamline the process not to complicate it.
First rounds eating your panel’s week?
See how Keka’s AI screener, interview scoring and AI notetaker move candidates from application to decision. Book a demo.















































