Perquisites in Income Tax: Meaning, Types, Valuation and Taxability Under Section 17(2)
Learn what perquisites are under Section 17(2) of the Income Tax Act and how they affect employee taxation, payroll, and TDS. This guide explains taxable and exempt perquisites, Rule 3 valuation methods, rent-free accommodation, company cars, ESOPs, concessional loans, reporting through Form 16 and Form 12BA, and practical payroll considerations for HR teams managing employee benefits and compliance.
Imagine one of your employees relocates to another city for a new role. The company provides a leased apartment, assigns them a car for the first few months, and payroll processes everything without issue.
Six months later, the employee notices a higher TDS deduction and reaches out, convinced there’s been a payroll mistake. After all, no additional salary was ever credited to their account.
In reality, payroll is working exactly as it should.
The apartment, the company car, and many other employer-provided benefits are treated as perquisites under Section 17(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Although employees don’t receive these benefits as cash, they can still form part of taxable salary.
Whether a perquisite is fully taxable, exempt, or taxable only for specified employees depends on the nature of the benefit and the rules prescribed under the Income Tax Act and Rule 3 of the Income Tax Rules.
Understanding those rules matters for more than just tax calculations. For HR and payroll teams, they influence compensation design, TDS deductions, Form 16 reporting, and overall payroll compliance. For employees, they explain why taxable income and take-home pay don’t always move together.
This guide explains what qualifies as a perquisite, how different types are taxed and valued, which benefits remain exempt, and how the rules apply in practical payroll scenarios. It also highlights the latest provisions applicable for AY 2026–27, helping HR teams, payroll professionals, and employees navigate perquisite taxation with confidence.
On that note, let’s get started.
Go back to that employee with the company flat and car. Neither benefit paid them a rupee directly, yet both count as taxable income.
That’s the core idea behind a perquisite: it’s any extra benefit, facility, or advantage an employee gets from an employer on top of salary, whether it arrives as cash, as something in kind, or as an obligation the employer settles on the employee’s behalf.
According to the tax code, perquisite is a casual emolument or benefit attached to a position, over and above wages, that puts something in the employee’s pocket.
Reimbursements repay an employee for money already spent on the company’s behalf. Perquisites create an actual economic gain, whether that’s free housing, a subsidized loan, or shares handed over at a discount. Because of that gain, tax law pulls perquisites into “Income from Salaries” even though they never touch a payslip.
Once a benefit qualifies as a perquisite, the next question is who it’s taxable for, and that comes down to a simple split.
This split is usually the first filter to apply when a new benefit shows up in a compensation package and someone asks whether it needs to be taxed. Get the answer here right, and most of what follows in this guide is just working out the number.
Before going further into perquisites specifically, it helps to separate them from something they get confused with constantly: allowances. The two show up next to each other on a salary slip, but they behave in almost opposite ways once tax comes into the picture.
| Parameter | Perquisites | Allowances |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Benefits provided in connection with employment | A fixed cash amount paid to cover specific expenses |
| Tax liability | Taxable, exempt, or partly taxable depending on type | Taxed once added to salary, in most cases |
| Mode of payment | Usually a facility or benefit | Almost always paid in cash |
| Influence on in-hand salary | None directly | Increases take-home pay |
| Examples | Rent-free housing, company car, ESOPs | HRA and medical allowances |
Why this matters for compensation design: Allowances sit in the cash component of the CTC and get taxed as they’re paid. Perquisites might not touch cash flow at all, yet they still need a separate valuation and reporting.Two benefits that look identical on an offer letter can end up taxed in completely different ways, which is a common source of employee confusion during appraisal season.
With that distinction in place, it’s worth looking at where perquisites actually get their legal weight from, since that’s what decides which benefits fall under this umbrella at all.
Everything discussed so far traces back to one provision. Section 17(2) decides what qualifies as a perquisite under salary income.
It works alongside Section 17(1), which defines salary and allowances, and Rule 3 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, which supplies the actual valuation math. In short, Section 17(2) tells you what is taxable, and Rule 3 tells you how much.
The section itself lists out exactly which benefits fall under its scope, and it’s worth having this list on hand because most disputes trace back to whether a benefit fits one of these clauses.
Rule 3 then walks through each of these clause by clause and assigns a valuation method, which is what the rest of this guide covers in detail.
Knowing that a benefit falls under Section 17(2) is only step one. The next question, and usually the one that actually decides tax outcome, is which of three buckets it lands in.
Taxable for every employee: Rent-free accommodation, a company car used personally, interest-free loans, and ESOPs. Tax applies regardless of role or pay grade.
That middle category depends entirely on a status called “specified employee,” and since it decides tax outcomes for a wide range of everyday benefits, it’s worth knowing exactly who qualifies.
A specified employee is any one of the following:
Tip for payroll teams: That ₹50,000 figure is calculated on annual income, not monthly, and it’s arrived at after excluding non-monetary benefits, income exempt under Section 10, and deductions under Section 16. In practice, the threshold is low enough that most full-time employees clear it, which means the specified-employee category covers a much wider slice of the workforce than the name suggests, not just a senior tier.
To keep all three categories straight in one place, here’s how they map against common benefits.
| Category | Examples | Tax Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Taxable for employees | Rent-free accommodation, interest-free loans, ESOPs, employer-paid obligations | Added to salary and taxed at applicable slab |
| Taxable for specified employees | Gas, electricity, water, domestic servants, concessional education, transport facility | Taxable only if the employee qualifies as specified |
| Tax-exempt perquisites | Laptop for official use, telephone/mobile, tea and snacks, medical insurance premium | Not added to taxable income |
Classification only answers half the question, though. Once you know a benefit is taxable, the next question is what it’s actually worth for tax purposes, and that’s the job Rule 3 does.
It doesn’t treat every perquisite the same way; each benefit type gets its own formula, which is why the valuation rules deserve a section of their own before diving into any one benefit specifically.
At its core, Rule 3 exists to compute the value of any perquisite an employer provides, directly or indirectly, to an employee or to a member of the employee’s household, by reason of their employment. That household clause matters more than it seems on first read, since it’s also what governs how family-use benefits get taxed later in this guide.
This is also the part that eventually shows up as an actual number on Form 16. Getting the classification right but the valuation wrong still produces an incorrect TDS deduction, and that’s the kind of error that surfaces months later as an employee grievance rather than getting caught upfront.
A number of perquisites, rent-free accommodation being the clearest example, are valued using bands tied to a city’s population rather than a flat rate. Under the current, post-2023 version of Rule 3, those bands are:
These bands replaced an older, higher set of figures, so if any internal documentation still references 15%/10%/7.5%, it’s worth updating.
Beyond percentage-based valuation, several perquisites are exempt entirely up to a defined monetary limit, and it helps to have these caps listed together rather than discovering them one at a time deep in a specific benefit’s rules.
With the general valuation framework in place, the next few sections apply it to specific perquisites, starting with the one that generates the most payroll queries.
Back to the employee from the opening example, the one relocated into a company flat.
Housing benefits like this are where most perquisite disputes and payroll errors originate, largely because the value depends on several variables at once: who owns the property, which city it’s in, whether it’s furnished, and whether the employer or a government body is providing it.
Each of those variables changes the formula, so it’s worth walking through them one at a time.
Start with the most common scenario:
An employer owned, unfurnished flat. The current Rule 3 bands, applicable since the 2023 amendment are:
This is based on 2011 census figures and replaced an older, higher set of bands, so if you’ve seen 15%/10%/7.5% quoted anywhere, that’s the outdated version worth correcting in any internal documentation.
The formula shifts again depending on how the accommodation is arranged and furnished:
One exception sits outside all of this. For Central and state government employees, valuation is based on the license fee for the residence, adjusted for whatever rent the employee pays, rather than a percentage of salary at all.
Putting these bands into an actual number makes the gap between cities clearer than the percentages alone.
| Scenario | City Category | Salary | Perquisite Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employer-owned, unfurnished, metro | Tier 1 | ₹12,00,000 | 10% x ₹12 L = ₹1,20,000/year |
| Employer-owned, unfurnished, mid-city | Tier 2 | ₹12,00,000 | 7.5% x ₹12L = ₹90,000/yr |
| Employer-owned, unfurnished, small town | Tier 3 | ₹12,00,000 | 5% x ₹12L = ₹60,000/yr |
| Hotel Accommodation | Any | ₹12,00,000 | Lower of 24% × salary or actual hotel cost |
Tip for payroll teams: A housing benefit in Mumbai and the identical benefit in a Tier 3 town can produce a taxable value twice as far apart, purely because of city classification. Assuming all housing perks are treated equally is a common misunderstanding worth heading off before appraisal conversations, especially for anyone relocating between offices.
Housing isn’t the only high-value perquisite that varies by ownership and usage pattern. The company car works on a similar logic, just with different variables.
If your organization runs a company car policy, you’ve likely already seen how many different scenarios it can produce. Motor car perquisites shift depending on who owns the vehicle, who pays running costs, and engine size, which makes company car policy a compliance question as much as a benefits one.
The most common setup is an employer-owned car, and the value here depends on who’s covering running costs:
Ownership can also sit with the employee rather than the company, and reimbursement changes the calculation again.
| Scenario | Perquisite Value |
|---|---|
| Car owned by employer, used wholly for official purpose | NIL if specified conditions are fulfilled. |
| Car owned by employer, used wholly for private purpose | Actual expenditure (incl. hire charges + chauffeur) + 10% p.a. of actual cost to employer – amount recovered from employee |
| Car owned by employer, partly official/partly personal | Specified amount (Rs. 1,800/Rs. 2,400 p.m. + Rs. 900 chauffeur) |
| Car owned by employee, employer reimburses, wholly official | NIL if specified conditions are fulfilled |
| Car owned by employee employer reimburses, partly personal | Actual employer expenditure – Specified amount |
Where this is a problem: Manually tracking which car falls into which bucket across a large workforce, and re-verifying it every time someone changes roles or usage patterns. Teams running this in Keka typically set the valuation rule once against each car policy and let it apply automatically from there, rather than recalculating it by hand every cycle.
A separate framework under the proposed Income Tax Act, 2025 (sometimes labeled “Rule 15”) suggests significantly higher figures, roughly ₹5,000 and ₹7,000 per month for two engine bands. Treat this as forward planning information only as it isn’t an applicable rule under current filings.
| Scenario | Old Rule 3 | New Rule 15 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Car (≤1.6L, employer-owned, mixed use) | Rs. 1,800/month + Rs. 900 chauffeur | Rs. 5,000/month + Rs. 3,000 chauffeur |
| Motor Car (>1.6L, employer-owned, mixed use) | Rs. 2,400/month + Rs. 900 chauffeur | Rs. 7,000/month + Rs. 3,000 chauffeur |
| Motor Car (≤1.6L, employee-owned, employer reimburses) | Rs. 600/month | Rs. 2,000/month |
| Motor Car (>1.6L, employee-owned, employer reimburses) | Rs. 900/month | Rs. 2,500/month |
Cars and housing are the perquisites employees notice immediately. Loans tend to be quieter, but the math behind them works on a similar principle: the value isn’t the benefit itself, it’s what the employee saved by not paying market rate.
The taxable amount on an employer loan isn’t the principal. It’s the notional interest the employee would have paid at market rates, minus whatever interest they actually paid. Working that out follows a fixed sequence.
Worked Example:
SBI’s rate for housing loans is taken as 10% and the employer charges the employee 6%. The taxable spread is 4%.
| Month | Opening Balance | Installment | Closing Balance | Interest Taxable (4%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 2024 | 6,00,000 | – | 6,00,000 | 2,000 |
| May 2024 | 6,00,000 | 12,000 | 5,88,000 | 1,960 |
| Total | 21,360 |
Not every loan gets taxed this way, though. A couple of exemptions sit right outside the standard calculations.
Loans are relatively rare compared to the next perquisite on this list. ESOPs, on the other hand, show up constantly once a company starts granting equity, and they’re the one most employees genuinely misunderstand.
An employee exercises their vested options, gets excited about owning shares, and then asks payroll why their salary tax jumped that month even though they didn’t sell anything.
This confusion is common, and it comes down to one fact: ESOPs get taxed twice, at two different points, under two different heads.
The first tax point is exercise itself, not the original grant. The taxable perquisite is the difference between the fair market value on the exercise date and whatever the employee paid for the shares. The FMV on the grant or allotment date isn’t relevant here; only the exercise-date value matters, and how that value gets determined depends on how the shares are traded.
| Scenario | FMV Determination |
|---|---|
| Listed on one exchange | Average of opening and closing price on exercise date |
| Listed on multiple exchanges | Average opening/closing price on the exchange with highest volume |
| No trading on exercise date | Closing price on the nearest preceding trading day |
| Unlisted | Value set by a merchant banker on or within 180 days of exercise |
The employer deducts TDS under Section 192 in the year of allotment, which makes ESOP taxation a payroll responsibility, not just something the employee sorts out at filing time.
Eligible startups get some breathing room here: tax can be deferred to the earliest of 48 months after allotment, the employee leaving the company, or the shares being sold.
The second tax point only arrives later, when the shares are actually sold. That gain is taxed as capital gains, with the holding period starting from the allotment date and the exercise-date FMV used as the cost of acquisition.
Worked Example: 100 shares exercised at ₹500 each, with an FMV of ₹6,500 on the exercise date.
Perquisite value = (₹6,500 − ₹500) × 100 = ₹6,00,000.
For teams running frequent ESOP cycles: Employers usually recover this tax either by collecting cash from the employee or through a sell-to-cover arrangement, selling a portion of the allotted shares to fund TDS.Keeping allotment dates, FMVs, and TDS deadlines aligned across dozens of employees is exactly the kind of tracking that gets error-prone in spreadsheets, which is why several Keka customers running active ESOP programs handle this stage inside the platform instead of a separate tracker.
Not every perquisite carries this much complexity. Medical benefits, by contrast, are one of the more straightforward categories, though the exemption still depends on how the benefit is structured.
Medical benefits are among the most useful tax-free perquisites in income tax, but the tax outcome depends on the type of support the employer provides. Some benefits are fully exempt, while others become taxable if they are structured as reimbursements outside the permitted limits.
| Medical Benefit | Tax Treatment |
|---|---|
| Treatment in employer hospital | Exempt |
| Treatment in government hospital for prescribed diseases | Exempt |
| Employer-paid health insurance premium | Exempt |
| Overseas medical treatment | Exempt subject to conditions |
| Employer-paid travel abroad for medical treatment | Not treated as a perquisite |
| Medical reimbursement in non-approved hospitals | Generally taxable |
Policy Update: The exemption for overseas medical travel is a relatively recent addition under Budget 2025, worth flagging if you’re updating an older HR policy document. An older ₹15,000 reimbursement exemption that used to apply is no longer the default reference point, so don’t lean on it without checking current guidance.
Beyond the major categories covered so far, a handful of smaller perquisites show up regularly in real compensation structures without getting much attention elsewhere.
These tend to surface at senior levels or in specific role types, and they’re easy to miss because they don’t look like “compensation” at first glance.
If the employer buys these from an outside agency, the taxable value is the amount paid minus whatever’s recovered from the employee. If the employer supplies them from its own source, it’s the manufacturing cost instead. Either way, this one applies only to specified employees.
Along similar lines, a sweeper, gardener, watchman, or personal attendant provided by the employer is valued at the salary paid to that person, minus any recovery from the employee. This is also restricted to specified employees.
Education benefits vary based on how they’re delivered:
The last one in this group covers physical assets. When an employer hands over a movable asset, like a laptop, the taxable value is the original cost minus depreciation for each completed year of use minus what the employee pays.
| Asset Type | Depreciation Rate | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Computers/Electronic Items | 50% per completed year | Written down value |
| Motor cars | 20% per completed year | Written down value |
| Other movable assets | 10% per completed year | Straight on cost |
Example: An ₹80,000 laptop transferred after two years depreciates to ₹20,000. If the employee pays ₹5,000 for it, the taxable perquisite is ₹15,000.
Alongside these taxable items, there’s a separate list of benefits that stay entirely tax-free, and it’s worth having on hand for both policy design and employee communication.
Tax-free perquisites in income tax are just as important as taxable ones because they help HR teams design attractive benefits without unnecessary tax friction. The key is knowing which benefits stay outside salary taxation and which ones need to be reported.
With the full range of taxable and exempt benefits covered, the remaining question is a practical one: whose responsibility is it to actually pay this tax, and how does it get reported.
Allowances and perquisites of income tax are both part of the salary structure, but they work very differently in tax terms. Allowances are usually fixed cash payments for specific expenses, while perquisites are benefits, facilities, or reimbursements linked to employment.
Section 17 splits salary income into three parts, and allowances and perquisites land in different ones:
A benefit can look like an allowance in a compensation breakdown, get budgeted like one, and still end up taxed as a perquisite once its actual legal character is examined.
Within Section 17(2) itself, perquisites split further into the three categories this guide has already covered: perquisites taxable in all cases, perquisites that are fully exempt, and perquisites taxable only in the hands of specified employees.
Practical key takeaways: The label used internally for a benefit, whether it’s called an “allowance” in an offer letter or not, doesn’t decide its tax treatment. The legal character of the benefit does. Two components that look similar in a CTC breakdown can sit in entirely different sections of the law, and only one of them adds to take-home pay.
With the classification and valuation side fully covered, it helps to see a few of these rules applied together in complete, worked scenarios.
A few worked examples have already come up while walking through housing, cars, and ESOPs individually. It’s worth pulling those together here alongside one more calculation that hasn’t yet come up: how perquisite tax actually flows into an employee’s monthly TDS.
Here’s the piece that usually isn’t obvious until it’s laid out step by step: a perquisite’s value doesn’t get taxed as one lump sum. It gets folded into the employee’s total salary, taxed at their average rate, and spread across the year through monthly TDS.
Take an employee whose income under “Salaries” is ₹10,00,000, of which ₹1,00,000 is non-monetary perquisites:
The tax liability sits with the employee, but the employer handles deduction and reporting. Since perquisites count as salary under Section 17(2), the tax shows up through payroll TDS rather than as something the employee settles separately at filing time, in exactly the way the last example just walked through. There’s one situation where the employer can step in more directly.
Key Exception: Under Section 192(1A), an employer can choose to pay the tax on a non-monetary perquisite directly. When that happens, the tax the employer pays isn’t itself treated as an additional perquisite for the employee, and it gets reported separately in Form 12BA. This option is common for large non-cash benefits, since the employee has no cash inflow to fund the tax from.
That reporting obligation flows into two specific forms, and which one applies depends on salary level.
Perquisite values need to show up somewhere official, and the form used depends on how much the employee earns:
Note before documentation: Newer Income Tax Rules reference Form 12BA being replaced by a form numbered 122. As with the Rule 15 figures mentioned earlier, this isn’t confirmed as applicable yet, so keep using Form 12BA until the change is formally in effect for your filing year.
It’s worth closing the loop on something mentioned in passing earlier: perquisites are a genuine part of an employee’s CTC, even though they never show up as cash in hand.
When an employer provides an amenity or benefit free of cost or at a concessional rate, that value is still part of the overall pay structure the company is bearing. For compensation communication, that means a CTC breakup should account for perquisites as a real cost component, separate from the cash salary line, even when the employee’s take-home figure doesn’t move.
Beyond the standard rules, a few situations sit slightly outside the usual framework and deserve a separate mention.
Some perquisite rules go beyond standard salary benefits and cover special situations such as family use, government accommodation, and post-employment payouts. These edge cases matter because they help HR teams avoid misclassifying benefits under section 17(2) of the Income Tax Act.
Perquisites are an integral part of employee compensation, even if they never appear as cash in an employee’s bank account. From rent-free accommodation and company cars to ESOPs and concessional loans, every benefit must be correctly classified, valued under Rule 3, and reported through payroll to ensure accurate TDS and compliance.
For HR and payroll teams, the challenge isn’t understanding the rules but applying them consistently across every employee, every payroll cycle, and every benefit. Manual calculations, changing tax provisions, and multiple valuation methods increase the risk of errors that often surface only during payroll processing or year-end reconciliations.
Keka helps simplify perquisite management by automating benefit valuation, TDS calculations, payroll processing, and compliance reporting, so your team spends less time on spreadsheets and more time delivering a seamless payroll experience.
Simplify payroll compliance and manage perquisites with confidence. Schedule a Demo
Q1. What are the perquisites in income tax?
Q2. What are perquisites in income tax with an example?
Q3. How is the value of perquisite calculated?
Q4. What is the difference between allowance and perquisites?
Q5. What do you mean by perquisites in income tax?
Q7. Who are specified employees under perquisites taxation rules?
Q8. How is rent-free accommodation valued for tax in metro vs non-metro cities?
Q9. Which medical benefits are exempt from perquisite taxation?
Q10. How are ESOPs taxed as perquisites?
Q11. What does Section 17(2) of the Income Tax Act cover?
Subscribe to keep up with the latest strategic finance content.
Request a demo