POSH stands for Prevention of Sexual Harassment. It’s basically short for Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. The full title actually describes what the law does in three parts: it prevents harassment, prohibits it outright, and lays out how complaints get redressed.
Before 2013, India didn’t have a dedicated law on workplace sexual harassment. That changed because of a Supreme Court case. In 1997, the Court ruled on Vishaka & Ors vs State of Rajasthan, a case that arose after a social worker was gang-raped for trying to stop a child marriage. With no law in place, the Court used that case to lay down the Vishaka Guidelines, a set of rules employers had to follow in the meantime.
Those guidelines held for 16 years before Parliament turned them into a proper law. The Lok Sabha passed the bill on September 3, 2012, the Rajya Sabha followed on February 26, 2013, and it received presidential assent on April 23, 2013. The Act came into force on December 9, 2013, and that’s the version still in effect today.
The Act exists to do three things:
1. Prevent sexual harassment at the workplace before it happens.
2. Provide a clear redressal mechanism for women who experience it.
3. Promote gender equality and a safe working environment.
It applies to virtually every kind of workplace in India: private companies, government bodies, NGOs, hospitals, educational institutions, and even private homes that employ domestic workers. It doesn’t matter whether the organisation sits in the organised sector, like a corporate office, or the unorganised sector, like domestic work or small informal businesses. If there’s a workplace, the Act applies.
There’s also no minimum headcount before the Act applies at all, even a single woman working at a two-person shop is covered, the 10-employee threshold only decides whether an Internal Committee is mandatory (more on that below).
Any woman who alleges she has faced sexual harassment at the workplace, whether she’s employed there or not. This is deliberately broad, it covers a client, a vendor, a job candidate, or a visitor, not just people on the payroll.
Anyone in a position of authority responsible for the workplace, a department head, founder, CEO, or supervisor. The Act holds this person accountable for compliance.
This isn’t limited to an office building. It covers factories, hospitals, schools, NGOs, and private homes employing domestic workers. It also extends to places a woman visits for work, like a client’s office, during business travel, or at an off-site event. This also applies to remote work settings since a video call or a work chat group counts too.
The Act lists five circumstances that count as sexual harassment:
One more thing worth knowing: the Act also covers harassment by a third party, like a client or a customer, not just a coworker or manager. The employer is still responsible for acting on it.
Any workplace with 10 or more employees must set up what the Act now calls an Internal Committee, still widely referred to as the ICC (the 2016 amendment officially shortened the name from ‘Internal Complaints Committee’, but the old name has stuck around in everyday use).
Members serve a maximum term of 3 years from the date of nomination.
The 10-employee threshold counts everyone, permanent, temporary, contract, and daily-wage workers. Below that number, there’s no legal requirement to set up an IC. Women there are covered instead by the Local Committee, covered next.
For example, a 60-person marketing agency without a senior enough woman to chair the IC can bring one in from its other city office to serve as Presiding Officer, rather than leaving the position vacant.
The Local Committee steps in for two situations: workplaces with fewer than 10 employees, where an IC isn’t required, and complaints where the employer himself is the person being accused.
Each district has a District Officer responsible for constituting a Local Committee. It must include a chairperson experienced in women’s issues, a woman nominated from the local area, two members with experience in social work or legal knowledge (at least one from a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe background), and the relevant social welfare officer for that district.
In practice: a woman working at a small business, or one whose complaint is against her own employer, files it directly with the Local Committee instead of an internal one. This matters most for informal and unorganised sectors, like domestic work, where an IC would never exist in the first place.
For instance, if a domestic worker facing harassment from her employer has nowhere to take an internal complaint, since there’s no IC in a private home. She goes straight to her district’s Local Committee instead.
A woman has 3 months from the incident to file a written complaint (or from the last incident, if it’s a pattern of behaviour), extendable by another 3 months if the Committee is satisfied she had good reason for the delay. If she’s physically or mentally unable to file it herself, someone else can do it on her behalf, a relative, friend, co-worker, or legal heir.
Here’s a ready-to-use complaint form template if you need a starting point.
Before a formal inquiry starts, the Committee can attempt conciliation, but only if the woman asks for it. This can’t involve any monetary settlement. If conciliation succeeds, the Committee records the terms and closes the case.
If conciliation isn’t requested, or doesn’t work, the Committee runs a formal inquiry and must finish it within 90 days. For this, the Committee has powers similar to a civil court, including summoning people and calling for documents.
While the inquiry is ongoing, the Committee can recommend interim measures, like transferring the woman or the accused, or granting her leave. Once the inquiry wraps up, a report is due within 10 days, and the employer or District Officer has 60 days to act on its recommendations.
Confidentiality is mandatory throughout. Section 16 makes it a punishable offence to disclose the identity of the woman, the accused, or details of the inquiry, except in specific circumstances the Act allows for.
Mandatory Employer Responsibilities (Section 19)
Organise regular workshops and awareness programmes for employees, plus orientation for Committee members themselves so they know how to run an inquiry properly. The Act doesn’t fix an exact frequency, but running these at least once a year, and again whenever new employees join, is the common practice.
File an annual report with the District Officer summarising how many complaints were received, resolved, and are still pending, along with the action taken. Keka’s annual POSH compliance report guide walks through the filing steps and deadlines.
Government departments, ministries, and PSUs also need to register on SHe-Box, a central portal from the Ministry of Women and Child Development that tracks complaints from government workplaces. Private employers can register too, and many do, but it isn’t mandatory for them the way it is for government offices.
| Violation | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Failing to constitute an Internal Committee, not filing the annual report, or any other first-time contravention of the Act | Fine up to ₹50,000 |
| Repeat contravention | Double the fine, plus possible cancellation, suspension, or non-renewal of the organisation’s licence or registration. |
| Breach of confidentiality (Section 16) | Disciplinary action under service rules, and in some cases prosecution |
One thing worth knowing if you’re worried about complaints being misused: Section 14 does allow action against a complainant if a Committee finds the complaint was knowingly false or malicious.
But simply failing to prove the allegation isn’t enough on its own, the Act specifically says that. Malicious intent has to be separately established through an inquiry before any action is taken against the woman who filed it. This distinction matters in practice: the bar for proving malice is deliberately set high, precisely so that a complaint that simply couldn’t be substantiated doesn’t get treated the same way as a deliberately false one.
The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Rules, 2013 came into effect alongside the Act, on December 9, 2013. They spell out the practical details, like formats for filing complaints, how Committee members get appointed, and what the annual report needs to include.
The Repealing and Amending Act, 2016 renamed the committees, ‘Internal Complaints Committee’ became ‘Internal Committee’, and ‘Local Complaints Committee’ became ‘Local Committee’, and expanded their role to cover prevention and workplace sensitisation, not just handling complaints after the fact. Since August 2021, the Ministry of Women and Child Development has pushed for stricter enforcement, including audits of annual POSH reports and a shift toward digital submissions.
The core Act applies uniformly across India, but a few states, including Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Delhi, have issued their own notifications on things like appointing nodal officers or digitising the reporting process. These vary by state and change from time to time, so it’s worth checking your local labour or women & child development department if you operate in more than one state.
Any woman, regardless of her age or employment status, who experiences harassment at a workplace covered by the Act. This includes employees, contract workers, interns, clients, and visitors.
3 months from the incident, or from the last incident if it’s a pattern of behaviour. The Committee can extend this by another 3 months if there’s a good reason for the delay.
Yes, indirectly. There’s no requirement to set up an Internal Committee below 10 employees, but women there are still protected, their complaints just go to the Local Committee instead.
No, not under this particular Act, it specifically protects women. Men who face workplace harassment can raise it through their organisation’s general grievance mechanisms, or other applicable laws. Some organisations choose to extend POSH-style protections to all employees through their own internal policy.
An annual report to the District Officer, covering the number of complaints received, how many were resolved, how many are still pending, and what action was taken in each case.
The official text is published by India Code, the Government of India’s legislative repository. It’s the most reliable source, since third-party copies floating around online sometimes miss later amendments.