Succession Planning is how organizations continuously develop employees to promote eligible ones to key positions, ensuring business stability and growth.
Initially seen as a replacement approach for executive positions, succession planning has evolved into a broader process that helps in:
Succession planning helps organizations sustain their growth and productivity, especially during leadership transitions or periods of change.
Failing to plan leads to:
There are three successful models of succession planning:
They are discussed below:
In this model, organizations focus on training and developing their in-house talent to succeed in the positions in case of death, resignation, or retirement. All the junior supervisors, senior supervisors, mid-level executives, and top-level executives participate in the leadership development programs, and regardless of their positions, they undergo similar training. However, this model is heavily dependent on additional funds and resources.
Here, a few of the competent employees undergo leadership training to ensure the availability of competent leaders when organizations face unfavorable situations. The training programs are designed to accommodate specific positions’ needs and are a relatively cost-effective model than the previous one. However, it faces a roadblock when the potential successor quits the organization, creating a vacuum in the role.
Organizations hire employees from outside the organization to succeed in critical roles. This is effective as there may be many competent leaders outside the organization. However, they need to be retrained to familiarize themselves with the organization’s operating procedures and standard protocols, making it a costly and time-consuming model.
Here are the key differences between the three models of succession planning:
| Aspect | Mass Recruitment | Specialized Recruitment | Outside Recruitment |
| Talent Development | Limited focus on skill development. | Tailored training for specific skills. | Dependent on existing skills. |
| Successor Readiness | May not align with future needs. | Create successors for key roles. | Immediate fit for key positions. |
| Internal Pipeline | Limited emphasis. | Cultivate internal talent pool. | Expand talent pool to outside. |
| Role complexity | Entry-level job roles. | Focused on roles with specialized skills. | Complex or specialized roles. |
| Organizational Fit | Overlook cultural or strategic alignment. | Aims for cultural and role fit. | Aims for fit with organizational goals. |
| Diversity and Inclusion | Not a priority in hiring. | Can contribute to a diverse workforce. | Can bring fresh and diverse perspectives. |
48% of business leaders firmly believe that robust succession planning has significant cultural, operational, and financial benefits. They are listed below:
Succession planning helps preserve the stability and structure of organizations, assuring the various stakeholders of the business viability. Employee motivation is another benefit, as succession planning involves identifying and developing talent and intrinsically motivating employees with rewards and recognition. Additionally, it also cultivates a culture of continual learning and growth.
Did you know that succession planning helps organizations overcome similarity bias and unconscious partiality, making the leadership pipelines more equitable and inclusive?
They are the most profound benefits of succession planning, including increased morale, greater job satisfaction, and reduced attrition. It also helps in creating a talent pool surrounding critical positions, allowing organizations to reap the benefits of having a solid set of leaders, and competent ones succeeding in the future.
Succession planning helps an organization in the following ways:
Organizations often think succession planning is heavily cost-dependent. However, a recent study shows that unplanned succession costs an average of $1.8 billion in shareholder value. Thus, making it a critical investment for organizations will impact their sustainability and the long run of business operations.
| Direct Costs of Not Having a Succession Plan | Indirect Costs of Not Having Succession Plan |
| Severance Package | Time and cost lost in onboarding underprepared candidates. |
| Unplanned board meetings with unexpected travel costs. | Damage to third-party relationships based on ongoing leadership relations. |
| Premiums paid for unplanned and external hires. | Lower morale and disrupted team dynamics. |
| Lawyers, consultants, public relations, etc. | Higher turnover as employees leaves unstable organizations. |
Organizations mostly face these hurdles while they begin a succession plan:
Here is a general framework to implement successful succession planning in your organization:
If you want to gain more practical insights on Succession Planning, refer to this blog.
Subscribe to keep up with the latest strategic finance content.
Request a demo